Chapter 28
Pride (Humble or Hubristic), Embarrassment, Guilt, and Shame
Classic physiological and behavioral expressions of pride include an erect posture with head held high, a slight smile, and hands on hips or raised arms (picture Rocky on the steps of the Philadelphia Museum). There are also neurological activations of the medial prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.
At the same time, researchers distinguish between two forms of pride. Authentic pride is linked to genuine accomplishment and confidence. It promotes motivation and prosocial behavior. Hubristic pride is rooted in arrogance or an inflated self-view. It is correlated with narcissism and aggression. Let’s dive deeper into the distinctions between these types.
Aristotle
called Pride the crown of all virtues. In contrast, Christianity lists Pride as
the deadliest of the seven deadly sins. What gives? Of course, the Greek
philosopher was referring to “proper pride” – a balanced recognition of one’s
own worth without exaggeration or false modesty. This kind of pride sustains
dignity, motivates excellence, and strengthens resilience. Christians, in
contrast, were talking about arrogance, as in hubris. Authentic
pride motivates learning and growth; hubris resists correction because it
denies weakness and exaggerates superiority.
The difference between the two lies in proportion and orientation. Pride
emerges from genuine accomplishment and self-knowledge; hubris arises from
delusion and overestimation. Pride looks inward with a balanced recognition of
both strengths and limits; hubris looks outward with domination and is dismissive
of others. Pride fosters dignity and connection; hubris isolates, breeds
resentment, and often precedes a downfall.
In
world history, we see these differences played out. Nelson Mandela exhibited
pride in his cause and resilience. He inspired people around the world.
Authoritarian rulers like Napoleon and Hitler exemplified hubris in their
overreach as they plunged their nations into catastrophe. History has yet to be
written on the futures of today’s superpower nations, though Rome is a lesson in
an empire that expanded beyond sustainable limits. The challenge for
individuals and societies alike is to cultivate authentic pride while guarding
against the lure of hubris. In doing so, humanity can balance confidence with
humility, strength with restraint, and ambition with wisdom.
Let’s
leave hubris now and consider pride’s unfortunate counterparts – embarrassment, guilt, and shame. All of these emotions are feedback mechanisms that tell us
whether our actions align with or conflict with our internalized story of “who we
are” and “who we want to be.”
Embarrassment
arises from minor social mistakes or awkwardness. We feel it when the flaws of
our public image are momentarily revealed. We blush, laugh nervously, and look
down. The positive consequence is that in challenging our idealized identity,
it reinforces our social awareness and promotes humility…particularly when we
own our faux pas.
Guilt
is triggered when our specific actions cause harm. Admitting poor behavior is
not an admission that “we are bad people” but that “I did a bad thing”. Its
behavioral expression is apologetic gestures and reparative actions. Admitting and
correcting our mistakes encourages empathy and accountability and repairs social
bonds.
Shame
may be the most difficult emotion to experience. We have violated a moral or
social standard. Our identity of being a “good person” is threatened, and we
feel our unworthiness has been exposed. We avert our gaze, slump our shoulders,
and look for a rock to hide under. Yet, as long as it doesn’t become a chronic
condition that paralyzes us, it can promote positive conformity and moral
self-regulation.
When
we acknowledge our mistakes, we not only improve our future behavior and patch
social strains, but we can also strengthen relationships. Others know how
difficult it is to admit mistakes and will appreciate the respect we’ve given
them in our acts of contrition. If we
deny our mistakes, we miss an opportunity to benefit relationships and learn
from our experience. What I am saying here assumes we genuinely agree with the
standards we have strayed from. If we can honestly say – without
rationalization - we believe the standard is wrong, we should feel free to
respond in a different way.
Let’s now explore the subject of Identity in greater depth. The focus of Part III will be on “Who I am”.